|
Post by beavaristotle on Nov 13, 2019 10:20:27 GMT -8
1) careless with the basketball. 2) poor free throw shooting. 3) inability to defend an athletic team. 4) Scoring droughts.
they were able to cover up the 14 turnovers against ISU by shooting 57% on 3 pointers. maybe the free throw shooting (67%) will come around, but it's unlikely they will suddenly be able to defend an athletic team or take care of the ball. i think maybe a true point guard (put E.T. at the 2 spot) would help with the scoring droughts by getting people in the right spots and getting them the ball where they want it. hope i'm wrong but this feels like a NIT team of 1st round and out of the big dance.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 13, 2019 10:29:24 GMT -8
1) careless with the basketball. 2) poor free throw shooting. 3) inability to defend an athletic team. 4) Scoring droughts. they were able to cover up the 14 turnovers against ISU by shooting 57% on 3 pointers. maybe the free throw shooting (67%) will come around, but it's unlikely they will suddenly be able to defend an athletic team or take care of the ball. i think maybe a true point guard (put E.T. at the 2 spot) would help with the scoring droughts by getting people in the right spots and getting them the ball where they want it. hope i'm wrong but this feels like a NIT team of 1st round and out of the big dance. not totally the same
Careless with the basketball? 8 turnovers. Not good but not bad enough to be important in this game. Oklahoma also had 8 TO's. free throw shooting? 7-10. What's so horrible about that? Maybe you mean the "10" part because Oklahoma had "22". inability to defend an athletic team. The second half did look famiiar in this respect, but Oklahoma is a + athletic team and Oregon state neutralized their athletes in the first half by good ball movement and good screening and playing good switching D. Scoring Droughts. yes i agree this reared its head again. the 5 minute+ scoring slump in the second half was the difference. Call a time out halfway through that and dial up a play, start working the officials to get to the line. Do SOMETHING.
|
|
|
Post by beaverbeliever71 on Nov 13, 2019 10:35:18 GMT -8
1) careless with the basketball. 2) poor free throw shooting. 3) inability to defend an athletic team. 4) Scoring droughts. they were able to cover up the 14 turnovers against ISU by shooting 57% on 3 pointers. maybe the free throw shooting (67%) will come around, but it's unlikely they will suddenly be able to defend an athletic team or take care of the ball. i think maybe a true point guard (put E.T. at the 2 spot) would help with the scoring droughts by getting people in the right spots and getting them the ball where they want it. hope i'm wrong but this feels like a NIT team of 1st round and out of the big dance. not totally the same
Careless with the basketball? 8 turnovers. Not good but not bad enough to be important in this game. Oklahoma also had 8 TO's. free throw shooting? 7-10. What's so horrible about that? Maybe you mean the "10" part because Oklahoma had "22". Actually Oklahoma only attempted 14 FT's.. they took 22 3pt FG's stats.statbroadcast.com/statmonitr/?id=287539
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 13, 2019 10:39:37 GMT -8
not totally the same
Careless with the basketball? 8 turnovers. Not good but not bad enough to be important in this game. Oklahoma also had 8 TO's. free throw shooting? 7-10. What's so horrible about that? Maybe you mean the "10" part because Oklahoma had "22". Actually Oklahoma only attempted 14 FT's.. they took 22 3pt FG's stats.statbroadcast.com/statmonitr/?id=287539yes you are correct. and they made 12 of 14 which is excellent. They are a solid team, well coached and talented and good shooters.
|
|
gnawitall
Sophomore
Posts: 2,352
Member is Online
|
Post by gnawitall on Nov 13, 2019 20:07:46 GMT -8
1) careless with the basketball. 2) poor free throw shooting. 3) inability to defend an athletic team. 4) Scoring droughts. they were able to cover up the 14 turnovers against ISU by shooting 57% on 3 pointers. maybe the free throw shooting (67%) will come around, but it's unlikely they will suddenly be able to defend an athletic team or take care of the ball. i think maybe a true point guard (put E.T. at the 2 spot) would help with the scoring droughts by getting people in the right spots and getting them the ball where they want it. hope i'm wrong but this feels like a NIT team of 1st round and out of the big dance. Talking Heads!
|
|
|
Post by beavers84 on Nov 14, 2019 18:03:24 GMT -8
Tinkle basketball at its best
|
|
|
Post by drunkandstoopidbeav on Nov 14, 2019 18:49:20 GMT -8
Tinkle basketball at its best Hey, in Robinson's 6th season we lost to an eventual 12 and 20 Coppin State team early in the season. If I have to tolerate a loss, I'd take an 8 point loss to Oklahoma over that.
|
|
|
Post by nabeav on Nov 15, 2019 10:51:20 GMT -8
We're 2-1 with a loss to a power 5 team that made the tournament 6 of the last 7 years and people are acting like the season is a bust and our team is irredeemable. What the hell guys.
Also if anyone else says we "look like a one and done in the NCAA Tournament team" like it's a bad thing, I propose they are banned from the basketball board for the rest of the season.
|
|
|
Post by mbabeav on Nov 15, 2019 12:05:54 GMT -8
Tinkle basketball at its best Hey, in Robinson's 6th season we lost to an eventual 12 and 20 Coppin State team early in the season. If I have to tolerate a loss, I'd take an 8 point loss to Oklahoma over that. Didn't we also lose to Western Oregon around that time?
|
|
|
Post by beaverbeliever71 on Nov 15, 2019 12:17:44 GMT -8
Hey, in Robinson's 6th season we lost to an eventual 12 and 20 Coppin State team early in the season. If I have to tolerate a loss, I'd take an 8 point loss to Oklahoma over that. Didn't we also lose to Western Oregon around that time? Yes they did lose to WOU... it was the next season .. Tinkle's first season.. first game as a matter of fact(was exhibition so didn't count).. but they did lose to them
|
|
|
Post by beaverbeliever71 on Nov 15, 2019 12:21:53 GMT -8
We're 2-1 with a loss to a power 5 team that made the tournament 6 of the last 7 years and people are acting like the season is a bust and our team is irredeemable. What the hell guys. Also if anyone else says we "look like a one and done in the NCAA Tournament team" like it's a bad thing, I propose they are banned from the basketball board for the rest of the season. Not to mention a WIN over a power 5 team that's been to the tournament 7 o f the last 8 seasons!!..and looks like they could be a tourney team this season.. but they lose to Oklahoma and the season is a bust so far lol.. and i can only hope that OSU is a one and done tourney team... means they would actually be in the tournament!!
|
|
|
Post by babeav on Nov 15, 2019 12:37:43 GMT -8
Lot of quit in many on this board, bad games happen UK lost at home to Evansville doubt their fans are calling for Cal’s head.
|
|
|
Post by baseba1111 on Nov 15, 2019 12:59:06 GMT -8
Lot of quit in many on this board, bad games happen UK lost at home to Evansville doubt their fans are calling for Cal’s head. Wait... Cal/UK are comparable to WT/OSU? In any way? Really?
|
|
|
Post by Henry Skrimshander on Nov 15, 2019 13:39:19 GMT -8
Lot of quit in many on this board, bad games happen UK lost at home to Evansville doubt their fans are calling for Cal’s head. Wait... Cal/UK are comparable to WT/OSU? In any way? Really? I'd say No. 1-ranked UK losing at home to Evansville is a lot worse than unranked OSU losing a neutral-site game to perennial-NCAA participant Oklahoma, wouldn't you?
|
|
|
Post by Judge Smails on Nov 15, 2019 13:48:07 GMT -8
Lot of quit in many on this board, bad games happen UK lost at home to Evansville doubt their fans are calling for Cal’s head. Wait... Cal/UK are comparable to WT/OSU? In any way? Really? WT doesn't cheat and is a decent human being And OSU has also lost to Evansville.....and they didn't even take off their shooting shirts at the time.
|
|